58-2b pakistan gave the president discretionary power to dissolve the National Assembly - s55xcm Pakistan's Constitutional Subversions: An Analysis of Article 58(2)(b Article 58-2(b) Pakistan: A Tumultuous Chapter in Constitutional History

100-prize-bond-today-draw Article 58-2(b) of the Constitution of Pakistan has been a focal point of significant political turmoil and debate since its inception58(2B) termed a sword of Damocles for parliament. This specific clause, granting the President the power to dissolve the National Assembly, has been a recurring source of instability and controversy, profoundly impacting Pakistan's democratic trajectoryPakistan's 8th Amendment Analysis | PDF | Government. Understanding the implications and historical context of Article 58-2(b) of constitution 1973 is crucial for comprehending the evolution of governance in Pakistan.Timeline of Article 58(2)(b) in Pakistan's Constitution (1973)

The origins of the controversial Article 58(2b) can be traced back to General Zia-ul-Haq, who, while not directly abrogating the 1973 constitution, is credited with usurping parliamentary power by inserting this provision. Later, the Constitution (Eighth Amendment) Act, 1985, formally introduced and entrenched Article 58 (2) (b), providing the President with discretionary power to dissolve the National AssemblyArticle 58-2(b). This amendment was seen as a significant power shift, moving authority towards the presidency. The intent behind granting such authority has been debated, with proponents often framing it as a necessary safeguard against parliamentary misgovernance, while critics view it as a tool prone to misuse, undermining the very fabric of representative democracyconstitution (eighth amendment) act, 1985.

The impact of Article 58(2b) enabled presidential dismissals has been demonstrably destabilizing. From 1988 to 1996, for instance, Presidents like Ghulam Ishaq Khan extensively utilized Article 58 2(b) to dissolve assemblies. This period saw multiple governmental changes, often at the behest of the President, leading to a perception of elected representatives lacking security and permanence. The invocation of this clause by Ghulam Ishaq Khan under Article 58 (clause 2b) to terminate Benazir Bhutto's rule in 1990 is a prominent example of its use. The President’s decision was based on the grounds that a situation akin to the imposition of Martial Law in 1977 had arisen, illustrating the subjective and potentially politically motivated application of this power.All elections under the Constitution, other than those of the Prime Minister and the Chief Minister, shall be by secret ballot. This discretionary power to dissolve the National Assembly often left the government operating under a constant threat, described by some as a "sword of Damocles for parliament."

The political landscape in Pakistan continued to grapple with Article 58(2b) Pakistan.58(2B) termed a sword of Damocles for parliament During President Pervez Musharraf's era, Musharraf reintroduced Article 58 2(b) of the Constitution, re-endowing the president with the power to dissolve the National Assembly. This move, while aimed at consolidating presidential authority, further fueled debates about the balance of power between the executive and the legislature.The Eighth Amendment of 1985 had introduced Article58(2)(b), granting the President the power to dissolve the National Assembly in “his discretion where in his ...

However, the narrative of Article 58-2(b) eventually took a turn. The 18th Amendment to the Constitution of Pakistan, passed in 2010, marked a pivotal moment. This amendment critically aimed to restore parliamentary supremacy by effectively removing Article 58 2(b). Analysts widely view the 18th Amendment and the Demise of Article 58(2) (B) as a significant step towards strengthening parliamentary democracy and reducing the potential for presidential overreach. The removal of this clause meant that the power to dissolve the National Assembly would no longer rest with the President’s discretion作者：K Hanif·2021—View ofARTICLE 58(2B) AND ITS IMPACTS ON THE DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENTS OF PAKISTAN. Enter the password to open this PDF file..

The controversy surrounding Article 58-2(b) was scrapped from the Constitution is a critical aspect of Pakistan's constitutional history. The clause, and its various interpretations, have been the subject of extensive legal and academic scrutiny, as evidenced by works like "Pakistan's Constitutional Subversions: An Analysis of Article 58(2)(b) and Article 6" by L. Ali Khan. This analysis details how the clause, along with Article 6 (dealing with treason), has been central to discussions about constitutional subversions in Pakistan.

In essence, Article 58 of Constitution of Pakistan 1973, specifically its sub-clause 2B, represented a power that was consistently debated for its impact on democratic stability.17th amendment, Article 58 2(b): PML-N to get tough with ... While introduced with purported intentions of providing checks and balances, its historical application led to political instability and weakened democratic institutions. The eventual repeal of ARTICLE 58(2B) signifies a move towards a more robust parliamentary system in Pakistan, although the debates surrounding the division of powers within the Pakistani political framework continue. The legacy of Article 58-2(b) enabled presidential dismissals serves as a stark reminder of the delicate balance required to foster a truly democratic and stable governance structure.Article 58(2b) enabled presidential dismissals, destabilizing elected assemblies from 1988 to 1996. The 8th Constitutional Amendment shifted power to the ...