casino vs goodfellas Casino is the better film of the two - IsCasinobased on a true story Casino has a more differentiated plot than other mafia films Casino vs. Goodfellas: A Deep Dive into Scorsese's Masterpieces

Goodfellas vsScarface The cinematic landscape is graced by few directors as impactful as Martin Scorsese, and within his formidable filmography, _Goodfellas_ (1990) and _Casino_ (1995) stand as towering achievements in the gangster genreFor meGoodfellows, is definitely the better moviebut only by the cast as Stone ruined Casino, for me but each to their own.. Both films delve into the intricate, often brutal, world of organized crime, yet they offer distinct perspectives and experiences for the viewer. While _Goodfellas_ is often lauded for its kinetic energy and personal narrative, _Casino_ presents a more sprawling, opulent, and arguably more detailed examination of the mob's influence, leading to a perennial debate: which film is the better gangster film?

Many argue that _Casino_ is the better gangster film outrightWhich movie portray mafia gangsters better; Goodfellas or .... Its narrative, inspired by real-life persons and based on Nicholas Pileggi's non-fiction book, "Casino: Love, Money, and Murder in Las Vegas," offers a deep dive into the machinations of the Las Vegas casino empire controlled by the mobGoodfellas or Casino: Which movie is better?. The film meticulously details the financial operations, the corruption, and the ultimate downfall of this glamorous yet dangerous world.Whereas Goodfellas is examining tucked-away characters trying to evade the law,Casino shows characters who are more wildly extroverted and unabashedly visible, ... _Casino_ is considered by some to be more detail-oriented than _Goodfellas_, unfolding a story that is less linear and more focused on the systemic nature of the criminal enterprise, particularly through the multifaceted performance of Sharon Stone as Ginger McKenna, whose character's complex and manipulative nature drives significant plot pointsThe older I get, the more I appreciate Casino. Goodfellas is a more entertaining film, butCasino is the better film of the two. The cast is ....

In contrast, _Goodfellas_, based on the true story of Henry Hill, is often described as a more personal and intimate look at the life of a mob associate. It captures the allure of the gangster lifestyle in its youth, focusing on friendship, loyalty, and the thrill of the criminal world. _Goodfellas_ is frequently lauded for its pacing and iconic soundtrack, creating what some describe as a "sugar rush" experience.I Know Nobody Agrees With Me, But I Think Casino Is ... However, proponents of _Casino_ suggest that this initial excitement of _Goodfellas_ gives way to a more profound and impactful experience with _Casino_. They argue that while _Goodfellas_ may be more streamlined, _Casino_ takes the cake when it comes to complexity of its character and the depth of the performances, especially from Robert De Niro as Sam "Ace" Rothstein and Joe Pesci as Nicky Santoro.

The argument for _Casino_ being superior often points to its ambitious scope and thematic richnessFor meGoodfellows, is definitely the better moviebut only by the cast as Stone ruined Casino, for me but each to their own.. While _Goodfellas_ portrays characters trying to evade the law, _Casino_ showcases characters who are more wildly extroverted and unabashedly visible in their pursuit of power and wealth.Better than Goodfellas? Why Casino is Scorsese's true ... The film's visual style is equally distinct, reflecting the ostentatious nature of Las Vegas in the 1970s and 80s. This opulence, however, is underscored by a chilling brutality that feels even more pronounced than in _Goodfellas_."Casino" suffers the same problems as "Goodfellas", just ten times worse! It has a dull and predictable story, abysmal acting, cheap special ... The violence in _Casino_ is often more graphic and psychologically disturbing, reflecting the stakes involved in maintaining control of such a lucrative empire.

Some critics initially found _Casino_ to be overly long and perhaps too similar to _Goodfellas_, leading it to be met with "faint suspicion and disappointment." However, time has allowed for a deeper appreciation of its artistry. _Casino_ is not a bad movie at all; in fact, most would agree that it's really good and a more accomplished and artistically mature work than its predecessor. It presents a different facet of Scorsese's exploration of the American dream corrupted by greed and violence, moving from the street-level struggles of _Goodfellas_ (the gangster in his youth) to the empire-building and eventual collapse of _Casino_ (the gangster in his middle years). This chronological approach, when considering _The Irishman_ as the elder statesman of the mob, paints a comprehensive picture of the genre through Scorsese's lens.

Ultimately, the debate over casino vs. goodfellas boils down to individual preference and what one seeks in a cinematic experience. _Goodfellas_ offers a thrilling, immersive ride into the heart of the mob with an unforgettable narrative voice. Its IMDb rating of 8.7 from over 1.3 million users attests to its broad appeal. _Casino_, on the other hand, provides a more expansive and analytical look at the corrupting influence of money and power, driven by exceptional performances and a meticulous attention to detail. It has an IMDb rating of 8.2 from nearly 600,000 users, indicating its significant critical and popular acclaim. While _Goodfellas_ is the better film in terms of sheer entertainment value for some, _Casino_ is the better film for those who appreciate its epic scale, thematic depth, and unflinching portrayal of a world built on vice. Both films are essential viewing for any aficionado of Mafia movies and Martin Scorsese movies, showcasing the director's unparalleled ability to capture the allure and devastation of a life lived outside the law.